M/S KAMAL ENTERPRISES & ANR. Vs A. K. CONSTRUCTIONS CO. the Court has no territorial jurisdiction.

Girish Kumar submits that, as per Section 14 (1) of the Act, the District Court or the designated authority has concurrent jurisdiction when entertaining a petition. The party is given the option of ...

The 1st petitioner is the wife of the 2nd petitioner. Subedar with the Corps of EME in the Indian Army. 15.01.2020. The 2nd petitioner's mother had predeceased his father. After the death of the 2nd ...

If you require any more information or have any questions about our privacy policy, please feel free to contact us by email at [email protected] At http://www.lawweb ...

This concept has evolved primarily through judicial interpretation since the term "conscious possession" is not explicitly defined in the NDPS Act. This Court through various of its decisions has ...

NIRANKAR NATH PANDEY Vs STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Petition. Aggrieved by this, the Appellant is before us. Twenty Eight Thousand Six Hundred Five only). For ...

We have considered the submissions advanced at the Bar.